Saturday, November 04, 2006

Which is a bigger win for the Islamofascists?

Is it better for them if the Republicans win and we stay in Iraq, or is it better if the Democrats win and force us out?

It does seem like an easy and obvious question, doesn't it? Of course it's better for them if we leave. We'd stop killing so many of their foot soldiers, and they'd have an enormous propganda victory which they could use for recruiting.

Right now, it's "Come to Iraq and become a martyr by helping us drive out the United States and the Zionists!"

If we leave, it'll be "We beat the United States. We can beat anyone. You go fight in Great Britain. You go to France. You go to Japan. We cannot be beaten. They have no stomach for a fight."

It's all common sense, and yet if you listen to some, they'll try and tell you that the United States' presence in Iraq is just what the insurgency wants. Think about that carefully. Certainly our presence there is a recruitment tool, but is it really what they want? Even if they want a war against the west, which they so plainly do, don't you think they'd rather fight it over here rather than in their country? Don't you think the slogan "we beat America" would be far more effective than "come to Iraq and die"?

Common sense says yes. We'd better not leave Iraq until the job is done. It's suicidal to leave and hope the problem solves itself.

No comments: